<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IE7 From a Layman&#8217;s Point of View</title>
	<atom:link href="http://workingathomeinternet.com/WP/2006/10/24/ie7-from-a-laymans-point-of-view/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://workingathomeinternet.com/WP/2006/10/24/ie7-from-a-laymans-point-of-view/</link>
	<description>Trials, Tribulations and Triumphs of a Small Business Owner</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 20:55:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://workingathomeinternet.com/WP/2006/10/24/ie7-from-a-laymans-point-of-view/comment-page-1/#comment-2782</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 22:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workingathomeinternet.com/WP/2006/10/24/ie7-from-a-laymans-point-of-view/#comment-2782</guid>
		<description>Hey Scott,

I do like IE7 to an extent.  I haven&#039;t really gotten into it too much yet, but it works enough like 6 that I am comfortable with it.

As fare as FF, I have it only to view what my blog looks like on it.  I have never really gone further than that.  Maybe I should.

I&#039;m always looking for a better way to do things.

Thanks,

Joe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Scott,</p>
<p>I do like IE7 to an extent.  I haven&#8217;t really gotten into it too much yet, but it works enough like 6 that I am comfortable with it.</p>
<p>As fare as FF, I have it only to view what my blog looks like on it.  I have never really gone further than that.  Maybe I should.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m always looking for a better way to do things.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Joe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://workingathomeinternet.com/WP/2006/10/24/ie7-from-a-laymans-point-of-view/comment-page-1/#comment-2778</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 22:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workingathomeinternet.com/WP/2006/10/24/ie7-from-a-laymans-point-of-view/#comment-2778</guid>
		<description>Joe,

I&#039;m yet to write a full review of IE7, but a quick thought. If you&#039;re comparing it to IE6, it&#039;s great. One thing to keep in mind, however, is that Firefox has already had all of these features for some time.

For business use Firefox certainly wins my vote. If you haven&#039;t already checked it out, head over to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mozilla.com/firefox/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.mozilla.com/firefox&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m yet to write a full review of IE7, but a quick thought. If you&#8217;re comparing it to IE6, it&#8217;s great. One thing to keep in mind, however, is that Firefox has already had all of these features for some time.</p>
<p>For business use Firefox certainly wins my vote. If you haven&#8217;t already checked it out, head over to <a href="http://www.mozilla.com/firefox/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mozilla.com/firefox</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
